Priesthood definition according to lds.org, "The word priesthood has two meanings. First, priesthood is the power and authority of God. ... Through the priesthood, God created and governs the heavens and the earth. Through this power, He exalts His obedient children, bringing to pass “the immortality and eternal life of man” ( Moses 1:39; see also D&C 84:35–38).
Religious Perspectives
Official Doctrine of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints: the Standard Works (without any emphasis I add) quotes from general authorities, apostles and prophets in General Conference, or anything with the seal of the First Presidency on it. My blog is my interpretation of things- if it does not inspire, enlighten and uplift, then do not count it as doctrine. I am human, and I do not have a perfect knowledge of things.
Saturday, March 3, 2018
Priesthood
Priesthood definition according to lds.org, "The word priesthood has two meanings. First, priesthood is the power and authority of God. ... Through the priesthood, God created and governs the heavens and the earth. Through this power, He exalts His obedient children, bringing to pass “the immortality and eternal life of man” ( Moses 1:39; see also D&C 84:35–38).
Thursday, April 21, 2016
Questions
With this post however I want to address questions. I like questions. Questions give you something to study in seeking an answer. I think questions can be good. Some people who sign petitions or are vocal about their questions against things that are happening in the LDS Church use this to prove they are correct in questioning things. While I think questions are good, I don't think ALL questions are good. If you are taking an academic class- a stupid question (there are such a thing) would be a completely off-base question for the topic of the class. (For example, don't ask your Calculus teacher for their analysis of why the Roman Empire fell). And then on top of stupid questions there are rude questions. For example- let's say you're a music major and talking to someone who wrote a nationally used textbook for Physics. Don't ask the physics expert a question and phrase it in a way that implies that you somehow, studying music, know more about their life's work than they do. With these things said- I feel that questions are good, so long as they are not stupid or rude.
Now, let's start applying this to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The whole basis of this church is founded on the principle that we believe that God has once again called Prophets to be His mouthpiece. We are told in the Bible to judge between a true and false prophet by their fruits- so the fruits of Joseph Smith are the Book of Mormon and this Church. There are break-offs of the Church who believe that the Book of Mormon is true and that Joseph Smith was a prophet but that the succeeding prophets were not called of God. If you believe the current prophet is not called of God or that Joseph Smith and the first few prophets set up a faulty Church then perhaps you do not belong in this Church but a break off. If you do still believe that things are for the most part good and led by God then I just think you need to be aware of how you word your questions, and hold onto your faith whilst waiting for answers to your questions.
Prophets. They are men and still capable of making mistakes. They are human after all and to say they are incapable of making mistakes would be blasphemy since we believe Christ is the only perfect person to walk this Earth. I hold to this scripture, in Deuteronomy 18:20, "But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die." And D&C 1:38, "What I the Lord I have spoken, I have spoken, and I excuse not myself; and though the heavens and the earth pass away, my word shall not pass away, but shall all be fulfilled, whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same." These scriptures mean that the Lord will not allow His prophets to lead the Church astray. Does this mean that everything will be right? No. But we will be blessed for obedience and proper questions. Hold onto your faith that the Lord still leads and guides this Church and that any policy that may have faults in it will change (for policies of the Church CAN and do sometimes change). If the policy was made with a doctrine in mind, the doctrine will not change, but depending on the world and men, policies can change and hopefully will become better and better.
So let's talk about proper questions. If you truly believe that God leads the Church then you believe that whether it is by the Lord's voice or His servants it is the same. To question the Prophet in a way that challenges his authority, you are in essence saying that you know better than an all-knowing and perfect God and His choice to pick an appropriate mouthpiece. Be careful how you word your questions. Your same concerns can be addressed without challenging a perfect God's authority and choice in servants.
So what is the proper way to phrase a question? Think about your concern or problem with an issue. Ponder it and pray for understanding as to why the Prophets (in at least trying to do what is right) might have felt this was the right path. Pray for personal understanding and acceptance and to strengthen your testimony. Because of the faults of man, there are times when a mistake can be made and so even in your attempt to understand your concern may not vanish. But if you hold onto your faith that God leads this Church and will not allow the Prophet to lead the Church astray (this is different than a Prophet putting a bump in the path that may not need to be there) then you can trust that they at least had good intent in making any decision or policy. If you successfully complete this step and still have a question/concern, you should be able to at least phrase your concern in a way that doesn't challenge God as well as the Prophet/leader whom you disagree with.
Consider outside circumstances. For example, doctrinally we know there is nothing against blacks holding the Priesthood, yet there was a policy in place for a time that didn't allow them to hold the Priesthood. Was this a mistake? My theory is that it was not a mistake or fault of the Prophets. David O McKay wanted to change the policy long before he got the approval to do so. This tells me that it was in place for a reason, even if there was nothing doctrinally wrong with it. So here's the theory of me: maybe the world was not ready for it to happen. Let's take a different scenario. Why did people in the 1700s not have the blessing of the gospel? Was there something wrong with everyone living at the time? The answer is no. But the Lord was preparing the way for a time in which the Church could survive. He was working on a country that established religious freedoms. It was not a perfect country (as can be seen from the Civil War and many changes, amendments and extra laws to ensure the proper freedoms are indeed granted to all). I think the Lord waited long enough so that the Church could survive. Yet they were still persecuted because of religious beliefs. My theory on blacks and the Priesthood was that God was still working on the country, through the Civil War and Civil Rights issues with Martin Luther King, Jr and Rosa Parks to prepare them to accept what doctrinally was known- Blacks are equal to Whites. Perhaps if the Church had been granting Blacks the Priesthood before when they did it might have started persecution against the Church again. He did not wait til things were perfect to grant Blacks the Priesthood (as can be seen by ongoing racist problems) but perhaps He waited long enough that the Church would not suffer as a result. So, with your question, consider if there could be things outside of the Church that may justify making a policy that seems to postpone blessings of the gospel that doctrinally belong to all eventually. (For example, the new policy concerning children of homosexual parents- they are not permanently denied baptism. Children are not eternally condemned, if we believed this then there would be no purpose in doing baptisms for the dead for people who had encountered the Church in life. Agree with it or not, but the policy does not eternally condemn any.)
Third, the proper way to go about things. Let's briefly address the wrong way. The wrong way to go about displaying your disagreement is to shout loudly at conference "NO" when sustaining your leaders. There are many who disagree with things the Church is doing. Not all can come to the Conference Center. Even if everyone with concerns could come to the Conference Center to shout no, the Prophet and apostles would not have time to address each concern. All it does is disrupt the mood of conference. I'm sure someone would say, 'But if I don't shout, they won't know that I have a concern in such a big crowd'. True, but even with hearing you they direct you to talk to your local leaders. Might I suggest skip coming to Saturday afternoon's conference with the only intent of shouting no and going straight to your local leaders. It has to go through local leaders because the Church is too big for the people at top to one on one address every concern and still lead the rest of the Church. Sometimes local leaders don't pass on every concern because you have not phrased it as a genuine concern but more as a lack of faith in God to choose appropriate servants. This is why you should take time for my first two steps.
I loved my Mission President. He once told me a story about his Stake President and how he didn't think he was doing something right. He prayed for understanding and still felt uneasy. He was friends with the Stake President and so went to him and said, look, I know you're trying to do your best, and if you don't change your policy I will still follow it but I see possible problems with________. I learned from him that you can show that you trust in God to call proper servants. Because even local servants are called of God. If you have faith that God calls His prophet, then you have faith that he chose the right person to call lower leaders who are the right people to call others and others down to a Relief Society President. Granted you may not like everyone called for every calling but perhaps it is the right thing to do to give the person a chance to grow because God cares about every single individual. But you can trust in your leaders and still bring possible problems to their mind. Then they can pray to know what is right, knowing all the proper information and sometimes (not always) things will change.
I feel I have said everything I wanted to. Please remember the faith you do have and seek to understand "the other side" to either change your own opinion or understand it well enough so that your questions do not challenge authority but only the problems at hand.
Friday, November 20, 2015
Syrian Refugees
I've been reflecting on what this time of year means to me. It's the time when I celebrate Jesus Christ's birth. Whether you celebrate Christmas or not, maybe you can agree with some of what I may share.
Christ was born in Bethlehem. King Herod heard rumors of a Savior, King of the Jews, being born. King Herod saw this new "king" as a threat to him and was afraid. So what did he do? He killed every baby under 2. Hundreds or thousands of innocent babies in search of one threat. All on a rumor. If you're Christian, you don't see it as a rumor, you see it as truth, but Jews say it was just a rumor. So it still can't be proven.
Granted, a terrorist is threat to more than one person's throne. We're talking about rumors of a Messiah versus a terrorist (to masses ). But both are fear punishing thousands of innocents for rumors of one.
So you say it's been confirmed, one of the terrorists entered Paris disguised as a refugee? Do we know he is still using the same disguise? Do we have no physical description of him to look for him? (If not then how do we know he was disguised as a refugee? If we know his name we can find a photo of him.) Do we know that he is still living? If he's still living and disguised as a refugee, I have no problem searching for him among the refugees, but let those who pass inspection come find refuge.
We, Americans, were not attacked this time. Paris was. What did Paris do after the attacks? They opened their doors to strangers. They let people find refuge. Did they know if they were letting a killer in? Or a terrorist? No. But they did not let what happened to them and fear take away their humanity.
And who are we kidding? Are we saved from tragedy for keeping one rumored terrorist out and thousands of refugees? I suppose, if we keep this terrorist out there will be no more murders in this country, no more serial killers, no more school shootings, no more mall shootings. Because terror and tragedy can only be caused by a terrorist from another country. And those terrorists from another country couldn't have possibly already sent terrorists to and America in disguise. If you say, but we know of this one. Then let's find him and stop punishing the masses for the one. If he is not to be found among them, then chances are he's dead or changed disguise (in which case we are focusing on the wrong group and punishing innocents).
And if you say, but these refugees are from Syria. They could be aligned with ISIS and still under disguise as a refugee until they reach America. So we're punishing them twice. Once for being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and once for not helping when we had the chance. I suppose in WWII, Nazi's could've disguised themselves to start slowly killing Jews in other places. Because everyone from Germany could be a Nazi. I guess this is true. Any one could've been. If we're sticking to WWII examples, out of fear we sent several Japanese to camps because one could've been a spy. That was racism. This is racism. It's just being blanketed as "fighting against terrorism". We obviously know something about the rumored terrorist among the refugees, otherwise we wouldn't be able to confirm anything. So let's use what we know, find the one, or find that he's not among the refugees anymore and stop using it as an excuse to not help innocent people.
And Christ said, "For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me." (Bible, KJV, Matthew 25:35-40)
At this time, when we remember Christ, it is His birthday we celebrate. What gift can we give Him? We can serve those in need- like the refugees.
When Christ was born, Mary gave birth in a smelly stable with animals (any women who have experienced a heightened sense of smell during pregnancy- how would you like to smell that during labor? ) because there was no room for them in the inn.
There is room in my heart for humanity. There is room in our country. The terrorists will not win, if I have any say, by killing 147 by gun and thousands by fear and hunger. If we do not help, we in essence help the terrorist succeed in killing more innocent people and we become an accomplice to their terrorism. I will not act in terror. I will not withhold because of terror. If I do, then terrorism has won by making choices according to terror. Let us be our own people. Seek out the terrorists, but let us not live by terror. Let us keep our humanity. Let us help those in need. Let them in.
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Prophets
I'm a Mormon. A member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. What exactly does this mean? Well it means several things, one of which is I believe the Lord has always, and will always call prophets (Old Testament, Amos 3:7) and that the Lord has called a prophet in the latter days.
So what is a prophet? A prophet speaks for God. "What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken... whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same" (D&C 1:38). The prophets speak for God and God's laws do not change due to peer pressure, petitions or a vote. God will remove a prophet if He is no longer saying what God wants us to hear. They are human (we believe Christ was the only perfect being to come to earth) and can make mistakes, but if something is brought to their attention and they pray about it, the prophet will know what is right.
I'm going to go on what may seem to be a tangent. What if we have questions? Good. We are supposed to question things and gain a personal testimony of things. If, through what seems like human error, we see something that looks amiss we have the right to address it. So what if women want the Priesthood? Say someone gets the attention of the First Presidency with this matter? Well then it's their turn to pray and seek an answer. They did. They told an individual not to publicly protest. Instead she publicly protested and put out a petition for Pele to sign.
Here's the problem. We know God is perfect, this is perfect in all things. He has perfect love for us, and has a perfect knowledge of what is right for us. And if God is perfect, then we shouldn't petition Him to change to be less perfect (He already is perfect and can't be more perfect). Do we presume to know more than God? You may say, she was petitioning the prophets, not God. But we believe the prophets are called of God and speak and act for God. A public protest shows we do not believe they are prophets any more. A petition mocks both their calling and even God Himself. If they are not prophets any more, then we do not believe this Church is led by God any more. And if this Church is not led by God, why would we want to be a member of it? She was excommunicated. She pretends like she cares about that but why should she? The whole basis of this Church depends on believing in living prophets. Her actions show that she did not believe in the prophets. After the matter was brought to their attention, things still did not change. If we believe this Church, then we must believe in living prophets which means we believe they speak for God. So in essence, God says women will not be ordained to the Priesthood. Are we going to persist in knowing better than God with His perfect knowledge and His perfect love for us? And if we believe the prophets are no longer prophets, then this living Church is no longer true, and we shouldn't care if we are members still or not.
This being said, God through His prophets (and I believe they are prophets) has said, "Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose." Men and women are created equally in God's image, but our gender is divine and we have different but equal roles in life. To use race as an example of being different yet equal. A black person is equal to a white person, but they are still different. A white person does not need to tan to try to become black in order to be equal. A black person does not need to bleach their skin to try to be equal, we are different but equal. As for different roles, people pursue different careers based on our characteristics of what we're good at and what we're interested in. I was not meant to be a doctor, I feel sympathy pains too easily for me to be any good in that line of work. But that does not mean I'm less than a doctor in value or purpose to God and the world. I will reiterate, God through His prophets had told us, "Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose." Gender is a characteristic. It helps determine our roles based on different talents, not because one is better than the other.
We should be proud to be women. We don't need to dress like men to prove we're equal, this would be like a man trying to change the color of his skin to become equal, but he is already equal and changing the color of our skin does not change that. I wear a skirt to church to show God that I am proud to be a woman and do not feel the need to change my gender to feel His love for me or to feel equal to men. (I also believe that pants, in the every day world are not exclusively men's clothing anymore.) I believe that me being a woman gives me unique characteristics, which give me a certain role and purpose.
So what if I will not be ordained to the Priesthood? I believe in some ways, I already have it. There are different callings within the Priesthood. I will never be a deacon, priest or elder but maybe I do have a different calling. One definition of the Priesthood is the power of God given to man, or permission to act in His name. With this permission, ordinances are performed. In the temple, women perform the ordinances for other women. I have been a temple worker, and although I was set apart, I was not ordained to the Priesthood, therefore, I must have already had some level of it. We also know that the power of God created this earth, therefore creation is a power of God. We receive God's permission to create life (with a man) when we get married. In addition to creating life, women have a knack for creating things, and I'm not just talking about crafts (not my strong point). Women are good at creating a peaceful environment. They are good at making a house into a home with a 'woman's touch'. This all falls under the ability to create and serves others, which is the purpose of God's power. Also women are good at leading by example. There may not be as many women mentored in the scriptures as men, but if you read the Old Testament looking for the women you will find them. You will also find that when a woman is righteous, those she has influence over are also righteous. When she is wicked, those she had influence over are also wicked. Women can lead with their influence. Don't we associate the Priesthood with leadership? A Bishop must be married, doesn't his wife have some influence over him? Maybe it's recognition then that people want. Maybe women don't like being a mere influence and leading by example. Are we seeking worldly recognition but claiming to be following God? The whole point of the Priesthood is to serve God's will. His will is not to pursue man's recognition. Women have power given to them/us. We have a role to play, whether it's actually the Priesthood or not, or role is not less than a man's duty in the Priesthood. We are not less because we're different. They don't talk of the importance of mothers at home with kids because we are not capable in the work place, but because we have a natural talent to influence children and create a home. In my marriage, I was the bread winner for a year. My husband gained a better understanding of how much work is done at home. The work done at home is not meant to belittle women because it's not bringing in the paycheck. If a woman's different role is belittled, it is not God's way. Not every woman stays at home, or is able to, but our differing roles in the church are different because of our talents, not because we are less than men with the Priesthood. Women are equal to men in the church and to God, despite having different purposes and sometimes different callings which enable us to grow.
(And as one final side note. Women do not go to the Priesthood session, because it's for men. It is not secret-it's messages are recorded and we can read them. Men are not also, in like manner, not invited to enrichment nights, RS book clubs, the general women's meeting, and other such activities. But you don't see them standing outside saying is unfair that they weren't invited and demand to be let in. The one exception is when a Priesthood member is asked to preside our attend a meeting, just in case the Priesthood is needed. Or to speak fondly of us as is done in the general women's meeting.)
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Promised Blessings for participating in Missionary Work
2. He Himself will go with you and be in your midst. Nothing shall prevail against you (D&C 32:3)
3. The Lord will stand by you (D&C 68:6)
4. Your tongue shall be loosed, and you will have the power of God unto the convincing of me (D&C 11:21)
5. Your mouth shall be filled and you shall become as Nephi of old (D&C 33:8)
6. You shall stand blameless before God (D&C 4:2)
7. You shall be lifted up at the last day (D&C 17:8)
8. You will be given a testimony of the words of the prophets (D&C 21:9)
9. You shall have revelations (D&C 28:8)
10. Your sins will be forgiven (D&C 31:5, 36:1, 60:7, 62:3, 84:61)
11. You shall have great faith (D&C 39:12)
12. You shall have blessings greater than the treasures of the earth (D&C 19:37-38)
13. He will take care of your flocks (D&C 88:72), and your back shall be laden with sheaves (D&C 31:5, 33:9)
14. You shall not be weary in mind, body, limb, or joint, and you shall not go hungry or thirsty. A hair from your head shall not fall to the ground unnoticed (D&C 84:80, 116)
15. Your joy shall be great (D&C 18:14-15)
16. He will send upon you the Comforter, which shall teach you the truth and the way whither you shall go (D7C 79:2)
17. He will go before your face. He will be on your right hand and on your left; His Spirit shall be in your hearts, and His angels round about you, to bear you up (D&C 84:88)
18. He will make you holy (D&C 60:7)
Clayton M. Christensen, The Power of Everyday Missionaries, p. 7-9
Elder Neil L. Andersen has witnessed, "If you're not a full-time missionary with a missionary badge pinned on your coat, now is the time to paint one on your heart-painted, as Paul said, 'not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God.'
...I promise you, as you pray to know with whom to speak, names and faces will come into your mind. Words to speak will be given in the very moment you need them. Opportunities will open to you. Faith will overcome doubt, and the Lord will bless you with your very own miracles." (Ensign, May 2013, 77)
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Missionary Work- 1 hour more (talk)
Thursday, August 15, 2013
Faith is a Decision
The thing is, there isn't a lot of proof. God doesn't come down and physically show Himself and His power to prove He is there. There also isn't proof that He isn't there. Just enough proof to create doubt in those who do not have faith.
In my life, I was raised religious. I was entering High School and talked to a religious (seminary) teacher and asked what I could do to prepare for my seminary class. She told me to read the Book of Mormon. So I did. It was my first time. And I got to the end and it tells you to pray about if these things are not true. All my life I leaned on my parents' testimony and did things simply because that was what we did in my family- not because of a real personal belief. So I started reflecting on things- more than just the Book of Mormon. What if the things I had been taught were not true? Well, if Joseph Smith wasn't a prophet, then the scriptural comforts found in the Book of Mormon are not true. What if God doesn't exist and life ends after we leave this mortal existence? What if there is no one greater than us who cares? And I realized- if there is nothing after this life, then what purpose is there in living? What really defines good behavior? Sure we can leave a legacy, and do something that will write our names in history... But what will we care once we're gone if we're truly gone? And how many, of the millions of us on earth, do enough to truly be remembered well enough to make it worth it if there isn't something more? So I made a decision and I felt right about it.
I decided to have faith. I decided to have hope. And most importantly- I decided I wanted to be happy. Believing in an afterlife brings happiness to my life. And if I'm wrong? Well, then I still lived a good life and at least my friends will remember me and I don't see any harm done. IF I lived a life not knowing the truth (assuming for a moment that there is no God) what does it really matter when I'm gone? I suppose God cares that I didn't believe in Him... oh wait, nope, no God, just a big vast nothingness. So, now back to my real beliefs- God does exist.
From that day when I decided to have faith and seek happiness, my faith has grown. I continued reading the scriptures and finished the whole Bible as well. And my faith has continued to grow. It makes so much sense to me. And no, I don't have any physical proof that God exists, but my life is full of miracles that are attributed to God.
And as for the Spirit- the Holy Ghost or the Holy Spirit. It's the way God talks to us. So, when we pray about a choice, or reflect upon a choice- if we pay attention to our feelings we can listen to the Spirit. And if you don't believe in the Spirit, stop and think about what you're doing. Seek lasting happiness instead of temporary happiness and won't your life be blessed whether it's the Spirit or your own logic? If something brings peace into your life- seek after it- whether you believe it's the Spirit or not.
The thing is: do you want to be happy? Do you want to have hope? Is it worth believing in something that you can't find physical proof for, if it brings you the hope and happiness you desire? Why else do you think people seek religion?